The ‘Superman’ Divide: When Fun Becomes the Fiercest Battleground in Film Criticism2 min read

Like this article? Share it!

The polarized response to James Gunn’s Superman has sparked more than just debate—it’s ignited a full-blown cinematic identity crisis. Critics are fundamentally split on whether the film is a joyous reinvention of the superhero genre or a soulless corporate product, exposing a deeper schism in how we define “fun” in modern blockbusters.

Two Movies, One Screen

For supporters like Variety’s Owen Gleiberman, Superman is a “ripping good yarn”—a witty, kinetic homage to Silver Age comics, anchored by David Corenswet’s “urgent, anguished” take on the hero. Detractors, however, dismiss it as “overstuffed snark”, arguing its breakneck pacing and quippy tone sacrifice emotional depth for empty spectacle. This divide isn’t just about taste; it reflects a philosophical clash over comic-book movies’ role in cinema.

The Fun Paradox

At the heart of the conflict: Can a film engineered for mass appeal—packed with Easter eggs, rapid-fire jokes, and interconnected lore—still deliver authentic joy? Gleiberman argues yes, citing The Super Mario Bros. Movie and Jurassic World Rebirth as examples of corporate filmmaking that retain wonder. Critics on the other side counter that Gunn’s aesthetic—“zappy,” hyperactive, and self-referential—has become a creative straitjacket, prioritizing franchise-building over storytelling.

Even the 1978 Superman isn’t spared re-evaluation. While Christopher Reeve’s performance remains untouchable, Gleiberman notes how nostalgia glosses over its “Carol Burnett Show”-level villains and uneven pacing—flaws that might be crucified today. The new film’s higher baseline for spectacle (flying is now mundane) forces it to compensate with tonal audacity, which some find exhilarating and others exhausting.

The MCU Effect

The backlash also ties to superhero fatigue. As Gleiberman admits, when films feel like “homework assignments” for future crossovers, their stakes ring hollow. Yet Superman’s standalone approach (despite DCU ties) suggests this critique isn’t universal. The real tension? Whether “fun” can coexist with artistic ambition—or if the very pursuit of fun has become a corporate mandate that drains it of meaning.

The Verdict

Superman’s reception proves that in 2025, “fun” is the most contentious word in criticism. Is it a celebration of pop artifice or a symptom of Hollywood’s decline? The answer depends on whether you see Corenswet’s cape as a flag of liberation or a corporate banner. One thing’s clear: In the era of algorithmic entertainment, even escapism can’t escape scrutiny.


Like this article? Share it!